CDD and PIRG (who?) complain about adCenter

Ash Nallawalla

5 November 2006

SEO


I hadn’t heard of the Center for Digital Democracy or the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, which isn’t surprising since I am in Australia, but perhaps they need the publicity. They have complained about Microsoft adCenter and other online services that collect information. The PC World article says:

CDD Executive Director Jeff Chester called on the FTC to shut down new forms of online data collection until consumer safeguards are in place. “Consumers have the right to have the option to opt in [to data collection],” he said. “What is wrong with letting the consumers make decision about how their data is used?”

Privacy fanatics want to be totally anonymous unless they deem otherwise. It’s a nice thought but most of them don’t run businesses, so they ignore the notion that business owners just might be able to deliver better service if they can collect some information about their customers. Similarly, there is a whole personalisation and CRM industry out there telling business owners to serve different customers differently (look up Peppers & Rogers).

Given my background in marketing and being a user of PPC advertising, I am on the side of CRM but this isn’t about me. When Microsoft launched adCenter, I applauded the ability to refine the demographic target audience for my ads. I don’t want to waste my money on an anonymous audience but I don’t want to know their names and personal details.

I wonder if these complainants are aware that Google also allows demographic targeting. Why didn’t they pick on the larger player? Here is the quote:

Chester called online data collection “pervasive and ubiquitous” and said the two groups focused first on Microsoft because it has told potential advertisers its data collection techniques are better than those used by rivals such as Google and Yahoo.

How is this relevant to click fraud? It is, in the sense that to protect these privacy fanatics against phishing and other nasties (and advertisers from click fraud), someone needs to collect information, in this case, about the bad guys. I don’t know if there is any way to identify the bad guys without collecting behavioural information!

I am active in running volunteer user groups and recently set up the Zune User Group. I used adCenter Labs to see what information was available about my target audience. Not surprisingly, I found that the target age group is <18,>

Ash Nallawalla

Search strategist experienced in large, complex websites. Ash's Google+ profile

Related Posts

Celebrating Captain Phirozshah Byramji Bharucha, DSO

Ash Nallawalla

25 February 2019

SEO

Feel free to share...FacebookTwitterRedditStumbleUponLinkedinemailOn Facebook I read the following post: “Col. Phirozshah Byramji Bharucha, who led the 14th Ferozepur Sikh regiment in the grueling hard fought key Battle of Gallipoli during World War I in 1915. While the 1981 Mel Gibson movie “Gallipoli” glorified the heroics of the Australian battalions during the Gallipoli campaign, the […]

Read More

SEO Implications of Google Ads’ New Exact Match

Ash Nallawalla

4 December 2018

PPC, SEO

Feel free to share...FacebookTwitterRedditStumbleUponLinkedinemailBrad Geddes has published an excellent post entitled “Exact match is no longer exact match – are you managing the changes correctly?” Although it is about PPC, can SEOs learn from it? It is a timely reminder for those of us in SEO and content writing to be aware of Search Intent versus Keyword […]

Read More

Older Posts