<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: P3P Privacy &#8211; Who&#8217;s Bothering?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netmagellan.com/p3p-privacy-whos-bothering-26.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netmagellan.com/p3p-privacy-whos-bothering-26.html</link>
	<description>Ash Nallawalla&#039;s search marketing (SEO + PPC + SMO + ORM) views and opinions from Australia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:41:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.netmagellan.com/p3p-privacy-whos-bothering-26.html/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netmagellan.com/?p=26#comment-29</guid>
		<description>There used to be a small SEO advantage in using P3P by getting linked from the W3 list of compliant sites. That page has been replaced by privacyfinder.org however.

It&#039;s still a good thing to have of course, even if only because creating and maintaining a policy forces you to put some effort into an area of your site that otherwise tends to be overlooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There used to be a small SEO advantage in using P3P by getting linked from the W3 list of compliant sites. That page has been replaced by privacyfinder.org however.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a good thing to have of course, even if only because creating and maintaining a policy forces you to put some effort into an area of your site that otherwise tends to be overlooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

