Ash Nallawalla's blog

SEOs vs search engines – what next?

Ash Nallawalla

16 April 2010

SEO

While reading another excellent Yahoo patent dissection by Bill Slawski (How a Search Engine May Identify Undesirable Web Pages By Analyzing Inlinks) I couldn’t help thinking about SEOs, particularly agencies.

Today I also happened to read some affiliate (joint venture) promotional emails pushing a new link-building tool, but I won’t give it any exposure here other than to say that the promoter was complaining about a “Google slap” to SEOs. There is a growing theme here.

A few days earlier I read The 8-Step SEO Strategy, Step 1: Define Your Target Audience and Their Needs where Laura Lippay posted a graph of Yahoo’s traffic drop following a relaunch. Their traffic never recovered. This was almost the same graph I had seen at the Australian Yellow PagesĀ® site following a major relaunch last September and thence.

Yahoo traffic graph
Yahoo traffic graph

What “used to work” isn’t working now, it would seem. Blame some of it on the Caffeine update; blame some on Google conspiracy theories, but blame a lot on not keeping up-to-date. Either way, some SEOs must be worried.

I consult to some of these agencies and have noticed a 30% drop in ranking success at one agency I have known for several years. I have also seen the work of other agencies where the customer didn’t get ranking joy and moved to another SEO.

The common theme arising at these SEO agencies is a failure to keep up with the search engines. Many use a checklist to tick off a list of tasks such as the following real example (their words):

  • Article submission
  • Directory submission
  • Search Engine submission
  • Social Networks submission
  • Technical errors correction
  • Remove Meta robots
  • Robots
  • Google Sitemap
  • Google Analytics code
  • Meta Keywords
  • Meta Description
  • Page Title
  • Image Alt Tags
  • H1 Tags
  • Content pasting

Those tasks are mostly fine, but the main issue is that this templated approach doesn’t suit all projects. After working with the agency (which needs to use checklists), they now have three longer checklists covering three kinds of projects they get:

  • Competitive niches
  • Non-competitive niches
  • Ecommerce sites in competitive niches

Back to the Yahoo patent, there is more scrutiny of backlinks to detect unnatural patterns. Most agencies I know keep a list of submission-friendly directories and blogs. They usually submit all clients to the same list but the more savvy ones take care to match a client to a relevant industry directory.

Too many directory links in quick succession should raise a flag at the search engines. What about a link from EzineArticles? If your site is linked from an article submitted to this popular directory, followed by a couple of others, does this look unnatural? Sure does to me. Most business owners would neither know those sites nor the concept of writing articles for republication. If search engines did not exist, would anyone write articles containing links to a website and submit them to an article directory?

Would an agency client be notified about a fairly new development that has SEO implications, such as microformats and have it implemented in their code? Google just announced mark up support for recipe RDFa/hRecipe microformats, which isn’t new, but once Google announces something like this, a lot of SEOs will take note.

(Incidentally, there is a WordPress plugin for hRecipe.)

Ash Nallawalla

Search strategist experienced in large, complex websites. Ash's Google+ profile

Related Posts

Sherpa for Majestic Chrome Extension – Review

Ash Nallawalla

21 October 2017

SEO, SEO Tools

Feel free to share...Most professional SEOs I know use Majestic.com for reliable backlink data. Majestic provides a lot of data about the links to a site, including data about the quality of those links. I have used it for many years, from the time it was known as Majestic SEO. I usually enter the URL […]

Read More

President Obama’s whitehouse.gov pages archived

Ash Nallawalla

22 January 2017

Other, SEO

Feel free to share...After Mr Donald Trump became the president at noon today (USA EST), many reported that the whitehouse.gov website removed references to Climate Change and LGBT. That isn’t entirely accurate. The website up to that point has been archived and can be found at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/. The LGBT URL was https://www.whitehouse.gov/lgbt but it redirects […]

Read More

Older Posts