Category: Search Engines

Will Experts Exchange become a victim of the new Chrome extension?

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Google just released a new extension for its Chrome browser. Initially I wasn’t sure what it is called, as it seemed to be “block sites from Google’s web search results”. On closer inspection, it is “Personal Blocklist” and here is the official description:

The personal blocklist extension will transmit to Google the patterns that you choose to block. When you choose to block or unblock a pattern, the extension will also transmit to Google the URL of the web page on which the blocked or unblocked search results are displayed. You agree that Google may freely use this information to improve our products and services.

The underlining is my emphasis. Continue reading

JC Penney followup: Doug Pierce’s research for the NYT expose

Reading Time: < 1 minute

A few blogs have picked up the story about the paid links allegedly obtained by JC Penney’s former SEO company SearchDex. Vanessa Fox’s detailed article in SearchEngineLand led me to Doug Unplugged, the blog of Doug Pierce, of Blue Fountain Media.

An interesting find by Doug was SearchDex’s client list, which has now been taken offline but might still be in the (Google cache). If you have a paid account at OpenSiteExplorer or MajesticSEO, it might be worth checking out the backlinks.

The discussion at Webmasterworld: Paid Links at JC Penney – Google Takes Manual Action.

Google index cap – 1 result for “Twin towers are no more”

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Some weeks ago I read Rand Fishkin’s post about Google capping its index and retiring a lot of old content. I didn’t think any further about that topic until I was writing my monthly column for APC Mag (April 2010). I was checking some search counts for some old news and found the numbers a bit low. So I thought I’d try some truly big news stories, taking care to choose a phrase most likely to be used only for the next 24 hours and not some recent coverage:

  • Princess Diana dead” = 397,000 results. Phrase match. OK, so the web was a lot smaller in 1997, so this might be OK.
  • Michael Jackson dead” = 29.8M results. This is more like it. Maybe there were more Diana stories and the search cap theory is true?
  • 2004 tsunami = 10.9M results in Google. Broad match. Yahoo7 shows 54.2M results. Bing shows 3.14M results.

Then the puzzler:

I had missed the terrible tragedy by going to bed (in Australia) just five minutes before the first plane hit, but I woke to the clock radio newsreader opening with “The twin towers are no more”. It took me a few seconds to absorb this apparently bizarre news bulletin and subsequently I heard that phrase many times that day. Surely, numerous print media also used it, so I am puzzled to find just 31 instances today in Google.

Bing is not a lot better – we are used to Bing counts being a tiny fraction of Google’s for a given search term:

Yahoo:

Finally, an unambiguous phrase, not date-restricted (there are lots of these namesake buildings around the world), spelt the American way to avoid counting many of the others:

Google:

Yahoo:

Bing:

Is Google becoming more relevant or pruning the index? I tend to think it’s the latter. Is this Caffeine?

Firefox hangs when loading clients1.google.com – Solutions

Reading Time: < 1 minute

I found that Firefox 3.5.6 was not loading Google.com in spite of trying a few times. I noticed in the bottom left of the browser (the status bar) that it was stuck at loading clients1.google.com. This was a new subdomain to me, so a quick search brought up a Google web discussion.

The initial suggestion by a Google employee to check for malware was not relevant. I had just performed a full system scan with no problems.

Another suggestion was to turn off Search Settings > Query Suggestions. I didn’t try it as I had no problem with that feature so far.

The third suggestion worked for me. At the top right of the Firefox page I changed the search provider from Google to Yahoo! and the search engine loaded as before. This doesn’t solve the problem, which is probably at clients1.google.com and not on my PC, but it is a workaround that suits me as I never use that search box in Firefox.

Australia is going Google – or nuts!

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Deepak Ramanathan of Google Australia has blogged “Australia is going Google … along with millions of businesses around the world” in the official Google Australia blog.

It’s a rosy picture – companies such as Konica Minolta, Rentokil Initial, De Bortoli etc have switched to Google Apps for their company operations. They no longer

have to deal with the hassles of managing email servers or rolling out software updates, and their employees now enjoy the convenience of shared documents and calendars, Gmail and more.

Gmail had outages in February, March, May and September this year according to this SMH article or this Computerworld article. Last year there were some more outages including one lasting 15 hours.

I have been in situations when my company’s network or email was down for several hours, so I know how unproductive it can be with several thousand employees unable to use their PCs. Multiply that across millions of SMEs and educational institutions and not only do you have a lot of frustration but a lot of unemployed sysadmins.

On paper, the use of SAAS (software as a service) looks attractive to bean counters, but did the soon-to-be-redundant IT staff have a say in the decision?

How are Australian companies dealing with the implication of moving personal data offshore (National Privacy Principle #9)? I am an early adopter in many ways but I am not ready for the cloud yet. How about you?

Does Bing Search know Bing?

Reading Time: 2 minutes

While doing my tests on Bing Local Search for IYPs, I noticed something odd. I was reading up on the Microsoft Bing onebox – the panel of eight local results and a map you get at the top of the SERP when you search for something including a place name. e.g. “Denver florist”.

First, I cleared all cookies and did not log in to either search engine.

I searched for “bing onebox” (in Bing) and was taken aback. Of the first 10 results, eight were about the great actor/singer Bing Crosby and two were about the search engine. For comparison, the same search in Google produced nine results about the search engine and one about Bing Crosby. Who’s right?

The Bing algorithm associated the individual words in “onebox” with “the number one box office draw” (a phrase repeated by many of the eight sites) and hence this result. So, Bing has stemming covered. As search marketers we tend to think of Google’s ten-pack as the only onebox (or one box) of consequence.

Let’s try searching for just “Bing”. The best match result is the search engine itself. The News results are also about the search engine. The next four results are interesting:

  • Bing Crosby’s Wikipedia entry
  • Bing energy drink
  • Bing SDK for iPhone
  • Bing Mail (an Australian product since 2001)

Then three results from Discover Bing; three from the Bing product guide; three from the Bing Cashback program; and finally, four video results, with two about the search engine.

Using Google for the same search term (“bing”), the results are similar:

  • The first two are the Bing search engine.
  • The next two are Wikipedia of which the first is the search engine; the next about Crosby.
  • The News results are all about the search engine.
  • The last five results are also about the search engine, as are the two video results.
  • Curiously, the related searches are weird, but there’s an algorithm for you:
    • bingo
    • steve bing
    • bing bandwidth
    • bing linux
    • bing cosby
    • ding
    • bing network
    • ning

My conclusion is that Google’s algo associates the word “Bing” primarily with the search engine, which is bad news for the energy drink and mail company. Microsoft Bing’s algo is kinder to the searcher. Its architects are making an allowance that Internet users still include people who know of Bing Crosby and of other concepts that include this word. I think this is a good thing.

Google testing Preferences link

Reading Time: < 1 minute

While using the Google NZ and Google AU search engines today I noticed the preferences link had disappeared from its usual location to the right of the basic search box. It was replaced by a new Search Settings link at the top right. Here is the new home page:

googprefs

Compare it with the Google.com home page:

googprefscomNothing major, but we get Groups, while the global version gets Shopping.

Bing Maps for Mumbai are seriously flawed

Reading Time: < 1 minute

I will let the pictures do the talking here. I looked at Bing Maps for my childhood home in Bombay, India, which is in the area known as Thakurdwar, South Bombay. Compare the Bing map on the left with the Google one on the right. Click the images to enlarge.

Thakurdwar, South Mumbai on Bing map Thakurdwar, South Mumbai on Google Maps
Look particularly at the streets in the Bing map and see how they seem to go through houses seen in the satellite image overlay. Queens Road (Maharshi Karve Marg) goes through the sports gymkhanas near the ocean! Other roads are also figments of someone’s imagination, perhaps drawn from memory?The little lane that skirts the little SK Patil Udyan (Garden) is Badod St, shown as Badod Galli (Lane) in the Bing map which barrels for kilometres through numerous houses in a straight line!

Many of the streets shown are in the wrong places.
Many of the streets shown are in the wrong places.

Check out for yourself at Bing Maps. (Annoyed that it forces the .au domain on me) Some of the other errors I noted:

  • Queens Road goes through the gymkhanas.
  • Apollo Bunder is near Regal, i.e. inland.
  • Salsette Island is near Flora Fountain and also near the Hanging Gardens.
  • Colaba has fallen into the ocean.
  • You get a Churchgate and a Church Gate.
  • Nariman Point has also moved Inland and Fort has moved south of it.
  • Khet Wadi also has a second clone.
  • There is a fixation with all these Wadis on the map, as if they are major roads.
The Google map doesn’t have these problems. The street names are not spelt correctly but are near enough.

Google Maps adds real estate search

Reading Time: < 1 minute

As of today, you can search for your next house on Google Maps.  To do this, begin at http://maps.google.com.au. Click the link to the right of the Search Maps button, labelled Show Search Options. Once you do so, the link will change to Remove Search Options and you will see a drop-down menu, where you should choose Real Estate.

You can refine the search by the usual controls you see at a traditional real estate site, such as Rent/For Sale, type of dwelling, type of bedrooms, number of bedrooms, car parking spots, area, and so on.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpSoAue9bf0&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fmaps.google.com.au%2Fhelp%2Fmaps%2Frealestate%2F&feature=player_embedded[/youtube]
If you are browsing, just enter a street or suburb and you will see balloons indicating properties for sale.  When you drag the map, the listings on the left will change to reflect the map window. You can explore any of them.

Google Maps real estate search
Google Maps real estate search

Clicking More Info in the speech bubble leads to detailed information about a specific property. Google has partnered with numerous real estate agencies to obtain the listings. Undoubtedly, the incumbent real estate website companies will be wondering how their traffic and revenues will be impacted by this Google innovation.

Google's Wonder Wheel

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Google Search has announced two new features that may interest some people. The first is Related Searches, which appears below the SERP and the other is a longer snippet if the search term is four words or longer. Not exciting enough for me.
Wonder WheelHowever, Google Blogoscoped reported some testing of new features that were more interesting to me at first glance.
You won’t see the test unless your PC collects a special cookie. Blogoscoped has kindly provided it in the article, so you can insert it into your PC and see the new playthings for yourself. I first read about this in Webmasterworld where posts by FTFlash and Robert Charlton describe these new features (click the above image to enlarge it). Note; You must use google.com, not a national one such as google.com.au.
If you get the cookie, you will see “Show Options” next to “Web” below the Google logo. In the above image I selected Wonder Wheel, which is depicted in the image above. You will see related searches in the spokes but the wheel itself does not play any visual games. It is simply a backdrop to the related searches. Being in beta, I can’t be too critical, but I don’t find the feature useful. For many searches, the spokes do not appear and you can’t click the hub (your search term), so you are left wondering.
For my test I chose San Francisco, being home to most Googlers. I clicked “San Francisco Attractions”, which opened up a second spoked wheel linked to the original wheel. I next chose “San Jose Attractions”, whereupon the original wheel becomes an outlined circle. For each selection you make, you get organic search results in the right half of the page and at the bottom you get a columnar list of the related searches seen in the Wonder Wheel. Strangely, I got “San Jose, Costa Rica Attractions” and “San Jose Costa Rica Attractions” (no comma the second time).
The Wonder Wheel will probably be a gimmick for me as I don’t run my applications in full screen mode and need to see most of the screen in a smaller window. What did you think of it?
The second new choice on the left is a Timeline for the current search term. This operates in a true AdWords broad match sense and made no sense for my “San Jose Attractions” search term (minus quotes). The timeline started in 1602 with a reference to the namesake San Jose in Panama. The next one in 1610 is in Mexico. And on it goes, giving unnecessary information for a query that started in San Francisco. The sixth result is the one in Silicon Valley.
The third new feature is Search Suggestions, 16 of which appear above the Onebox map and 10 local results. These did relate to San Jose, CA and were quite relevant.
Choosing “Images from the page” show two thumbnails next to each result, which would be popular for some searches.
In all these new features I did not see any AdWords, so I don’t know how messy the page will look with ads. Some people have reported slightly different test options. Let’s wait and see how these features morph into their final version.

Google’s Wonder Wheel

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Google Search has announced two new features that may interest some people. The first is Related Searches, which appears below the SERP and the other is a longer snippet if the search term is four words or longer. Not exciting enough for me.

Wonder WheelHowever, Google Blogoscoped reported some testing of new features that were more interesting to me at first glance.

You won’t see the test unless your PC collects a special cookie. Blogoscoped has kindly provided it in the article, so you can insert it into your PC and see the new playthings for yourself. I first read about this in Webmasterworld where posts by FTFlash and Robert Charlton describe these new features (click the above image to enlarge it). Note; You must use google.com, not a national one such as google.com.au.

If you get the cookie, you will see “Show Options” next to “Web” below the Google logo. In the above image I selected Wonder Wheel, which is depicted in the image above. You will see related searches in the spokes but the wheel itself does not play any visual games. It is simply a backdrop to the related searches. Being in beta, I can’t be too critical, but I don’t find the feature useful. For many searches, the spokes do not appear and you can’t click the hub (your search term), so you are left wondering.

For my test I chose San Francisco, being home to most Googlers. I clicked “San Francisco Attractions”, which opened up a second spoked wheel linked to the original wheel. I next chose “San Jose Attractions”, whereupon the original wheel becomes an outlined circle. For each selection you make, you get organic search results in the right half of the page and at the bottom you get a columnar list of the related searches seen in the Wonder Wheel. Strangely, I got “San Jose, Costa Rica Attractions” and “San Jose Costa Rica Attractions” (no comma the second time).

The Wonder Wheel will probably be a gimmick for me as I don’t run my applications in full screen mode and need to see most of the screen in a smaller window. What did you think of it?

The second new choice on the left is a Timeline for the current search term. This operates in a true AdWords broad match sense and made no sense for my “San Jose Attractions” search term (minus quotes). The timeline started in 1602 with a reference to the namesake San Jose in Panama. The next one in 1610 is in Mexico. And on it goes, giving unnecessary information for a query that started in San Francisco. The sixth result is the one in Silicon Valley.

The third new feature is Search Suggestions, 16 of which appear above the Onebox map and 10 local results. These did relate to San Jose, CA and were quite relevant.

Choosing “Images from the page” show two thumbnails next to each result, which would be popular for some searches.

In all these new features I did not see any AdWords, so I don’t know how messy the page will look with ads. Some people have reported slightly different test options. Let’s wait and see how these features morph into their final version.

Mastodon