A pox on reciprocal link requests (with free clues)

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Some people need to buy a clue or two. I get a couple of link requests most days. I don’t even open them but I took a look at today’s example:

I have visited your site and I think that the content could be of interest to our web site visitors.
If you feel that you would be interested in exchanging links please go to [url], here you will be able to enter your websites details into the appropiate category.

Please ensure that the reciprocal URL that is entered is working properly, otherwise the program will decline the exchange.

Our details are as follows:

Site URL: [url]
Site Title: [snip]
Site Description: [snip]

.. or use this HTML:

[snip]

If you have any other cross-promotion ideas, please let me know.

Please note that the link on our website can take upto 72 hours to be visable, due to the updating of the system.

Best regards,

Dear clueless Indian link monkey,

If you took the trouble to tell me which of my 65 websites you are referring to, you might have a chance of filling your day’s quota of links. How do I know you are from India? Apart from the IP address originating in India, you used the unique Indian English word “upto”. The rest of the world knows it as two words “up to”. Look it up in a dictionary.

The second free clue is that I have no websites concerning your client’s topic. Your boss seems to conduct “linking campaigns” for clients based on quantity, not quality. However, my giving your client a link from an off-topic page will do nothing for either of us and will lessen the relevance of my page for its topic. Your boss probably knows this, but business is business, right?

The third free clue is that not all websites have a free-form “links” page where they can conveniently drop your HTML. Many of my sites use Joomla and its built-in links component gives indirect links that don’t help SEO.

The fourth free clue is that the link anchor text needs to be varied, so giving others the HTML and anchor text will give your client a few identically worded links. This won’t help the client.

The last free clue is that your spellings suck. Many people won’t notice it, but the ones who do will be less inclined to play.

Google offers SEO services

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Would you believe Google:

scientifically optimizes existing client sites to create new, dynamic, crawler-friendly sites highlighting brand, nonbrand and long-tail keywords. Our experts methodically optimize copy and content for each page to boost page rankings.

It is true, in a roundabout way. Google now owns DoubleClick, whose Performics service delivers SEO services. Danny Sullivan has written an open letter to Google urging the latter to divest itself of Performics, owing to a conflict of service.

At the moment I’d hate to be a Performics customer if my rankings were below my expectations. I can just imagine the following fictitious conversation:

Customer: You are Google, so why isn’t my site ranking #1 for all my keywords? Don’t you know how to optimise for Google?

Performics: Sir, we are now owned by Google but we cannot influence search results to favour our own clients. We have delivered the best-practice SEO to your one-page website, which is about debt consolidation. That is a very competitive niche.

Customer: So what can you do to get me to #1 for “debt consolidation”?

Performics: Sir, Google’s Guidelines for Webmasters tells you not to use an SEO service that guarantees a top ranking. We can build some more pages, align existing content to search queries, and get you some more quality links, but we can’t guarantee a #1 ranking.

Customer: Why not?

Performics: Matt Cutts.

and so on.

Fortunately, Google has responded to Danny’s concerns. Read his open letter to get the rest of the picture.

Amex does a favour to the SEO profession

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Thanks to a sensational headline by Webpronews – American Express Guide Calls SEOs A “Waste”, the SEO profession might be pleased to know that American Express has done them an inadvertent favour.

The facts are a little less sensational. Amex USA sponsors an initiative called OPEN, which helps small businesses by getting them to meet locally via meetup.com. They sponsored a few publications to be made available from the OPEN meetup page. As happens in large companies, such publishing initiatives are a brief project in someone’s quarterly schedule and there isn’t time to check the contents of documents that were produced by external agencies:

The OPEN BOOK is a 96-page document containing contributions from several Amex experts and external agencies. I don’t think the book’s editors would see it their role to question assertions such as the following from the Cuban Council on page 59:

7. OPTIMIZE YOUR SEARCH ENGINES

Search engines, like Yahoo! and Google, are usually the first place people will look for you. Make it easier for them to find you. Yahoo! and Google offer tools to let them know the site map structure of your Web site. Also, using clean U.R.L.’s like yourdomain.com/store/widgets instead of yourdomain.com/store.php?id=42&categoryID=widgets will increase your chances of getting indexed in a search engine. Finally, don’t waste money on so-called Search Engine Optimization (S.E.O.) specialists. Search engines are very quick to penalize sites that try to trick their filtering techniques, and once your site has been put on Google’s blacklist, it will take forever to get off.

What a set of generalisations, purporting to be SEO advice? What was the writer trying to achieve here?

Another smaller document from OPEN is Marketing Your Business on Search Engines, a well-written document, clearly not by the previous author or publisher. It says, in part:

Maximizing your search engine marketing and optimization effectiveness may take more than just an employee with an aptitude for the Web. You may decide it is necessary to hire an experienced partner. Use these criteria to make an informed choice: (a list follows)

Now this is contradictory, but correct advice. In the other document, the youthful “Cuban Council” has its own agenda, being a web design company full of cool people who were perhaps only warning about “so-called” SEO specialists. The problem is that they did not tell the reader how to distinguish a so-called specialist from the real thing.

Therefore, the poor small-business person will be left with conflicting advice from the same page. They will probably get their website built by some cool young people who are unlikely to incorporate any SEO features beyond “meta tags” (every cool web designer knows about meta tags). Web design briefs almost never include any off-page factors.

Why is this a favour to SEOs from Amex?

My frequent refrain is, “The ignorance of web designers is the bread-and-butter of the SEO profession.” While business owners continue to buy websites from SEO-ignorant web designers/developers, their sites will always be in need of proper search engine optimisation. The better-informed business owners with their optimised websites will benefit because there will be less competition in the search engine results. Thank you, American Express.

Added:  SEW picked up this story over a month ago.

Experimental Google Search Interface

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Click to enlargeGoogle has been testing a simplified new interface in Australia for Advanced Search. I haven’t seen any mentions of it from people in North America or elsewhere.

The top of the form seems friendlier:

Find web pages that have…

all these words:
this exact wording or phrase:
one or more of these words:

But don’t show pages that have…

any of these unwanted words:

Need more tools?

Results per page:
Language:
File type:
Search within a site or domain:

Then a collapsible area for “Date, usage rights, numeric range and more”.

It is currently visible at 72.14.253.104, 72.14.253.99, 72.14.253.103, and 72.14.253.147. This has only been seen for google.com, not google.com.au. I think Google has made the right call for me at least, as I rarely use the options that have been collapsed.

Mastodon